Today I sent another SATA hard drive back to Seagate because it failed. You might recall that I have had a bad track record with SATA drives: since purchasing this PC about two years ago, I’d gone through about three Western Digital SATA drives (all replaced under warranty due to failure) until I finally got fed up about six months ago and bought a pair of Seagate Barracuda 250 GB drives. One of them failed after three months, and the other died just this past weekend. Fortunately, my PC is RAID-1 protected (and I have all the data backed up on DLT) – but seriously, why are SATA drives so prone to failure? Continue reading…
Recently on Twitter
- @philiph @jkuroda @standalonesa Wow, I pushed a button. What I mean is: once 90% of SA is programming, what separates SA from dev? in reply to philiph 1 day ago
- @blakecrosby No worse than Toronto I would say, but they are bigger in reply to blakecrosby 4 days ago
- I still don't understand how "troops" is the plural of "soldier". 4 days ago
- More updates...
Posting tweet...
Powered by Twitter Tools
Recent Comments
- DevOps and me | System Volume on Chef, devops, and the death of system administration
- Phil Hollenback on Chef, devops, and the death of system administration
- John on Chef, devops, and the death of system administration
- Maria on The fine line between publicness and narcissism
- Russ Jennings on Piling on Arthur S. Brisbane, unfairly
